Enterprise

Analytics for a digital-asset-management platform

The analytics layer of a digital-asset-management platform, designed from scratch (library, user and asset levels, reporting and export) and instrumented so the dashboards measure their own use.

Client's country
Canada
Platform
Web · B2B
Team
6 people · engineering, BA, QA, PM
Duration
6 months · 2023–2024
Asset performance in hand: previews and shares over time

Overview

A B2B platform for digital asset management needed to answer one question: what is all this content actually worth?

What I owned

I designed its analytics layer from scratch: dashboards for asset usage, storage and user activity.

Team

A team of six working directly with stakeholders, full cycle from research to design QA.

Result

The dashboards measure themselves: behavior analytics wired in fed every iteration.

Context

01

Product

A digital-asset-management platform for a leading content-management company: centralized storage, retrieval and sharing of assets across teams and markets, but with no analytics layer on top.

02

Users

Client teams with different roles and permissions: admins overseeing activity, managers guiding users, teams tracking asset performance, on desktop, tablet and mobile.

03

Market

A benchmark of four leading DAM platforms: 22+ analytics features compared to find best practices and the gaps worth taking.

Approach

Listen

Stakeholder quotes defined the goals and the dashboard structure.

Architect

Three reporting levels (DAM, user, asset), one consistent metric language.

Design every state

Loading skeletons, empty widgets and errors designed with the happy path.

Edge cases were predicted before build, so the dashboards stay honest while data loads, and legible when there is none.

Process

Competitor benchmarkStakeholder interviewsService blueprintPersonasUser flowsDesign systemEdge-case mappingBehavior analyticsData-viz accessibility

01

Problem statement

Three gaps named before anything was designed: asset usage, decisions, adoption.

02 · 4 DAM platforms

Competitor benchmark

22+ analytics features compared across the leading DAM tools: best practices and the gaps worth taking.

03

Stakeholder research

Direct quotes from key user groups defined goals and dashboard structure, from CSV export to mobile access to permission control.

04

Delivery scope

Research, design, build, QA and handoff: who covered what.

05

Solution architecture

Three reporting levels (DAM, user, asset), with SSO, time filters and export shared across all of them.

06

Data-visualization principles

Rules for charts: labels, abbreviations, colour and when each chart type fits.

07

Design documentation

Handoff documentation with content and readability rules, so the team builds and extends without guessing.

08 · usage insights

Behavior analytics

Usage tracking wired into the shipped dashboards (chart interaction, filter use, export and mobile share) fed every iteration.

Core functionality

01

DAM-level reporting

Problem

Out of everything the platform could measure, only some metrics lead to an action. Choosing those, and showing them so that clients with very different libraries read the same dashboard, was the whole job.

Hypothesis

If the key metrics are standardised across every dashboard, with detail on demand, clients with very different libraries will read them the same way.

Solution

The whole library at a glance: asset counts, storage, users, downloads and shares, with activity split by asset type, on desktop and mobile.

Totals, storage and activity by asset type

The whole library first, detail on demand.

DAM-level reporting across every breakpoint

DAM-level reporting across every breakpoint

Result

Key metrics standardised across every dashboard, with drill-downs for the detail and comparison by client or by period.

02

User-level reporting

Problem

The client paid per seat without knowing who actually used the system.

Hypothesis

If activity is shown per person (logins, downloads, shares), admins see where the licences work and where they do not.

Solution

Who actually uses the system: per-user activity, logins, downloads and shares, with search and role-based access.

Activity per user, sortable and searchable

Adoption per person: who actually uses the system.

Nothing found, and nothing loaded yet

Nothing found, and nothing loaded yet

03

Asset-level reporting

Problem

The library grew, but nobody knew which assets worked and which were dead weight.

Hypothesis

If every asset shows its own history of views and downloads over time, the team can see what is worth refreshing.

Solution

Every asset tells its own story: previews, downloads and shares over time, with dense data made scannable.

The same dashboard on a tablet and a phone

One asset's life over time: what's worth keeping.

One asset over time: previews, downloads, shares

One asset over time: previews, downloads, shares

The same asset dashboard at every breakpoint

The same asset dashboard at every breakpoint

04

Export

Problem

Dashboard data ended up in reports and decks anyway, as screenshots.

Hypothesis

If export produces clean CSV and PNG, the numbers reach the report without losing quality.

Solution

Charts leave the platform cleanly: CSV for tables, PNG and JPEG for visuals, ready for reports and presentations.

Export: a clean chart image or CSV, from phone to desktop

35% of users export, so charts leave the platform clean.

05

Adaptive behavior

Problem

Large datasets made dashboards slow to load, and people opened them on tablets and phones as often as on a desktop. The interface had to stay legible before the data arrived.

Hypothesis

If loading shows skeletons and emptiness is explained, the interface stays legible before the data arrives, on any screen.

Solution

Responsive layouts down to tablet and phone, skeleton loading and informative empty states, so the interface stays clear even before data arrives.

How widgets rearrange as the screen narrows

27% open analytics on a phone or tablet, so widgets reflow, not shrink.

Empty data and skeleton loading: designed, not left over

Empty data and skeleton loading: designed, not left over

Result

Skeleton loaders while data is fetched, informative empty states when there is none, and layouts adapted for desktop, tablet in both orientations, and phone.

Key decisions

01

Preset time ranges over a free calendar

Problem

Analytics tools drown users in date pickers, though most comparisons are routine, not custom.

Hypothesis

Most comparisons are routine, so presets will serve the majority better than a free calendar.

Solution

Preset ranges: yesterday, 7, 30, 60, 90 days, one tap away, with the calendar kept only for edge cases.

Proof

41% of sessions included at least one use of the date range picker: a routine tool, not a buried one.

02

Empty, loading and error states as first-class design

Problem

Data-heavy dashboards break trust the moment a widget shows nothing without explaining itself.

Solution

Skeleton loading, informative empty widgets and responsive rules designed alongside the happy path, for every widget, on every viewport.

Proof

The interface stays clear and consistent even when content is still loading or unavailable.

03

Measuring the dashboards themselves

Problem

Shipping analytics without knowing whether anyone uses it would repeat the client's own problem.

Hypothesis

If we track the dashboards like a product, iteration will be driven by real usage instead of opinions.

Solution

Wired behavior analytics into the dashboards: which features, filters and metrics people actually engage with.

Proof

72% of users regularly interact with asset performance charts, 58% use type filters, 35% export data, and those numbers fed the iteration loop.

Outcome

  • 72% of users regularly interact with performance charts
  • 58% use asset-type filters · 41% of sessions use the date range picker
  • 35% export data · 27% open analytics from mobile or tablet

DAM-, user- and asset-level dashboards designed from scratch, with one consistent language for metrics that client teams open daily for decisions.

Next case

Social video & games app

An app for meeting new friends over video calls, with games built into the call. I designed the core experience: call, chat and games unified into one surface, plus onboarding, profiles, messaging and the landing page.

View case